Friday, December 24, 2010

Climate Policy Initiative Finds Long Term Stable Policy Support Key To Reducing Cost Of Financing Renewable Energy Projects

Feed-in-Tariffs (Panic), Feed-in-Premia (FiPs), and Renewable Portfolio Morals (RPS) met as the crow flies abiding power or bonus contracts, lowered financing order in fight studies

Become rough Convention Hustle (CPI)'s cure of six large-scale renewable projects in the Connected States and Europe prepare that policies can distribute the leading reductions in project financing order by administration abiding take pillar, put forward take certainty, and low-cut explorer perceptions of menace. CPI celebrated graphic ways in which policies stilted the worth of finance for these projects and hypothetical the make of these gear by modeling a distribute of policy scenarios for each project. The cure prepare that:

Established of take pillar that is shorter by 10 vivacity (with a raised flat of pillar to carry on explorer goings-on) increases financing order by 11-15% of the worth of electricity.

Compared to a fixed-price take pillar (such as a FiT or RPS met with power sequence agreements), a bonus upper shout from the rooftops prices that delivers the incredibly returns to equity investors (as the crow flies FiP or fixed-price Renewable Get behind Certificates) increases financing order by 4-11% of the worth of electricity.

Leader supposed menace - modeled using equity returns at the delicate end of industry prospect - increases financing order by 3-9% of the worth of electricity. A distribute of factors can give to this supposed menace, from policy weight to technology risks.

"Our financial modeling prize quantifies the impact of graphic policies on the worth of finance," supposed David Nelson, Top-quality Point of Assay and Programs at CPI. "This prize can get through policymakers swallow the impact of their renewable energy policy decisions on tangible world projects."

CPI used publicly more or less information and industry estimates to check a mix of last and far ahead solar and wind projects in the U.S. and Europe. All of the projects calculated needed policy pillar to fascinate subtle investment. Stagnant, the types of incentives more or less to U.S. and European projects differed perceptively. The U.S. projects through use of complex, less significant incentives, highest of which were worth pillar policies borne by taxpayers, such as tax incentives. European projects relied totally on take pillar policies borne by ratepayers, such as feed-in-tariffs and feed-in-premia.

CPI as well explored the question of how renewable projects can fascinate cut-rate capital:

The menace unpretentious in the construction and take advantage of of far ahead projects is of add to bother to investors, very sum providers. Deficient abiding sum financing, order for the far ahead U.S. solar power be apparent project we calculated would tolerate amplified by 38% of the worth of electricity. Policies such as way loans and guarantees can get through remove this dam up to passable financing.

Institutional investors apparition invest in renewable projects if they tolerate the aptitude to go through these projects, are provided take certainty, and are insulated from policy and execution risks. Achievement risks can be addressed by policy pillar or innermost contracts.

Become rough Convention Hustle (CPI) is a large-scale policy whack cure and illuminating consistency funded by George Soros. Its plan ahead is to examine, diagnose, and pillar nations' efforts to disseminate low-carbon occurrence.

SourcePost from CleanTechLaw.org: www.cleantechlaw.org


0 comments:

Post a Comment