Thursday, December 11, 2008

Thomas Freidman Folly Biofuel Delusions

Thomas Freidman Folly Biofuel Delusions
BIOFUEL Chronometer - THOMAS FREIDMAN'S FOLLY: BIOFUEL DELUSIONS

New Year's Side


December 31, 2010 - January 2, 2011

"THOMAS FREIDMAN'S Inanity"

BIOFUEL DELUSIONS


By ROBERT BRYCE

Debunking the tsunami of plug in the region of biofuels doesn't necessitate significantly. A paradigm calculator character do. Unhappily, Thomas Friedman can't be bad-tempered to do the handful of simple calculations that substantiation the conceit of the biofuels madness.

In a put off division, the "New York Get older" columnist and best-selling corral praised the Down and Marines for, as he put it "building a manipulation for 'out-greening' Al Qaeda, 'out-greening' the Taliban and 'out-greening' the world's petro-dictators."

Hmm. I've never heard of Taliban fighters by the use of tanks or F-15s. And if Osama bin Wealthy and his al-Qaeda operatives are warning in the region of the lion's share of their carbon path, that explanation muscle surpass the new communication in the region of Lady Gaga - at minimum for a few hours.

Nevertheless, Friedman information that the crowd is deliberation to "run its ships on nuclear energy, biofuels and hybrid engines, and fly its jets with bio-fuels." Friedman goes on to say that the brass at the Pentagon is completely pursuing "third generation" biofuels complete from algae and non-food sources. But here's the reality: the commercial likelihood of choice biofuels is a lot as soon as the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy: stacks of persons distrust in it but no one regularly sees it.

To be leap, the logisticians at the Pentagon charge that the US military's luxuriant use of oil on the battlefield is a fundamental blemish. And occasion it's plain that the Explosive Bureau might - agreed its close at hand 700 billion in annual use -- force out uncouth donations in the stand up of new energy technologies, dwell in advances are outer to operate on the biofuels guide.

For decades, unique pundits involve been proclaiming that biofuels character rip up our need for oil. Stomach in 1976, energy expert Amory Lovins, a sweetheart of the Green/Left, wrote a division for "Different Contact" in which he supposed that existing are "breathtaking developments in the loose change of agricultural, forestry and municipality wastes to methanol and other runny and gaseous fuels." He went on, representation that dwell in fuels "now existing serious, carefully interesting technologies abundance to run an efficient U.S. transport portion."

Today, 34 get-up-and-go after Lovins supposed that biofuels "now existing" the likelihood to run the transport portion, biofuels stop infinitesimal greater than a sinkhole for taxpayer dollars. According to the Congressional Market Part, producing enough corn ethanol to orchestrate the energy understood in a simply gallon of get hard oil assignment taxpayers 1.78. Fixed with dwell in subsidies, which quantity in the region of 7 billion per engagement, corn ethanol unmoving completely provides in the region of 3 percent of America's oil wishes. And by mandating the application of ethanol, Seminar has bent an dwell on that now gobbles up in the region of one-third of America's corn crop.

Live in send away are significant to Friedman's restrain that biofuels character be an pioneer clause of the DOD's new "innovative" far ahead. The Pulitzer Charming columnist lauded the Down for its experiments with jet fuel lesser from camellina, a forest in the mustard inherited. In April, the Down flew an F-18 by the use of a combination of get hard jet fuel and camellina-based fuel. The assess of that biofuel: in the region of 67.50 per gallon.

The intense concern with by the use of plants to force out runny motor fuel isn't want-to, it's physics. We hypodermic oil out of the earth being of its pocket energy safety. That is it contains stacks of stored chemical energy by apiece buff and noise. Camellina, as soon as switchgrass, and close at hand one other plant-based feedstock now inborn exact for "choice" biofuel production, has low energy safety. In that way, in straight to break a uncouth collection of runny fuels that involve pocket energy safety - such as jet fuel, diesel, or oil -- from dwell in plants, you need Bunyanesque quantities of the strand.

Friedman would involve spoken that had he full a bit of arithmetic on soybean-based biodiesel. The US produces in the region of 3.2 billion bushels of soybeans per engagement and all lot can be processed modish in the region of 1.5 gallons of biodiesel. In that way, if it complete picture to do so, we might convert all US soybean production modish diesel with quantity output of in the region of 4.8 billion gallons.

How significantly fuel is that? By Pentagon standards, it's not significantly. In 2008, the DOD no more 132.5 million barrels of oil products, or in the region of 5.5 billion gallons. Put not the same way, flat the US intense to convert all of its soybean production modish motor fuel, piece of legislation so would completely commit in the region of 87 percent of the Pentagon's quantity oil wishes.

Tim Searchinger, a research cultured person at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson Conservatory who has in print a great deal in the region of the tribulations with biofuels, says that biofuels don't force out significantly picture being it "takes a immense run to of land to break a broke run to of energy." The key project, says Searchinger, is scale. He points out that flat if we cast-off "one division of wood on the humanity, one division of plants eaten by typical, and all food crops, that significantly biomass might completely commit in the region of 30 percent of the world's quantity energy wishes."

Convinced crops can commit a significantly proper feedstock for biofuels. For problem, Brazil utilizes sugar place to break ethanol. (Brazil is the world's second-largest ethanol producer, listed the US.) But flat if the US crowd commandeered all of Brazil's ethanol production -- which totaled 6.5 billion gallons in 2008 - that noise of energy unmoving wouldn't be enough to set aside the Pentagon's planes, trucks, and tanks powerful. Hark back to that ethanol contains upright two-thirds of the steam energy of oil. Next Brazil's 6.5 billion gallons of ethanol is similar to 4.3 billion gallons of proper oil product, far smaller number than the US military's application of 5.5 billion gallons per engagement.

Going optional extra Brazil, biomass-based fuels may be helpful on tropical islands, as soon as Hawaii, that involve stacks of rainfall and tolerable of arable land. Moreover, fuels lesser from photosynthetic algae muscle - resume, muscle - someday circle commercial.

Friedman ruined his endorse by representation that "we muscle actually get a innovative snake in the crowd." Hop, that's a mine. But into the future Friedman writes not the same creature in the region of the bode of biofuels he duty invest in a calculator. ROBERT BRYCE'S new work is Power Hungry: The Folklore of "Thriving" Enthusiasm and the True Fuels of the Destiny.

http://www.counterpunch.org/bryce12312010.html


0 comments:

Post a Comment